In short
  • An IP structure bundles trademarks, software, domains and licence rights in a dedicated entity.
  • The royalty rate must be at arm's length and supported by a contract and documentation.
  • Under OECD logic, returns belong to whoever actually controls development, maintenance, protection and exploitation.
  • IP box regimes require nexus: benefits are tied to your own research and development spending.
  • Royalty payments can attract withholding tax, and relief depends on the applicable treaty.
  • Transferring IP to another entity triggers a valuation and possible taxation of unrealised gains.
  • Design and valuation belong with licensed advisers in the countries of residence and incorporation.

What an IP structure is and how it works

In an IP structure a dedicated company owns the intangibles, meaning trademarks, software, courses, domains or patents, and licenses them to the operating company. The operating entity pays a royalty, which is an expense for it and income for the IP company. For this to be respected you need a written licence agreement, an arm's length rate and a documented rationale for the amount.

Who an IP structure suits

It becomes relevant where most of the value sits in a brand, software or content, for example with software providers, course businesses, franchise systems and consumer brands. It also fits when several countries or several operating entities use the same intellectual property. For a single local service business without scalable rights, the effort is rarely justified.

Transfer pricing and the question of functions

Internationally accepted practice allocates returns from intangibles to the entity that actually controls development, enhancement, maintenance, protection and exploitation, and that bears the related risks. A company that is only the legal owner while the real work happens elsewhere will at best be granted a limited routine return on review. Legal ownership alone is not enough.

IP box regimes and the nexus requirement

Several countries offer preferential regimes for income from qualifying intellectual property, for example Cyprus with a broad exemption of qualifying profits. These regimes follow the nexus approach: only the share of income attributable to your own research and development spending qualifies. Acquired rights without own development largely fall outside.

Withholding tax on royalties

Royalties are subject to withholding tax in many countries at the level of the payer. Double taxation treaties, and inside the EU the relevant directive, can reduce the rate or bring it to zero, but require beneficial ownership and usually a certificate of residence. Without treaty coverage the withholding tax becomes a final cost and changes how the royalty should be calculated.

When it becomes a problem

Transferring IP that already carries value is the critical moment, since unrealised gains must be valued and can be taxed. Royalty payments to related parties in preferential regimes are equally sensitive, because some countries restrict the deduction. And if the IP company is effectively managed from the founder's country of residence, it can become taxable there.

Common mistakes

The most frequent mistake is building the structure too late, once the brand is established and therefore valuable. The second is thin contractual ground: without a licence agreement, a defined basis and documentation, the structure cannot be defended. The third concerns the rights themselves, such as unregistered trademarks, unclear assignment chains from contractors or rights still held personally by the founder.

Alternatives and boundaries

Often it is enough to keep the IP cleanly inside the existing company and fix contracts, registrations and assignment chains. A holding company can bundle participations and assets without a separate IP entity. A dedicated IP company only pays off once multiple users, multiple countries or a planned sale justify it.

Next steps

Start with an inventory: which rights exist, who formally owns them, where they are registered and who actually develops them further. Only then can you decide whether a separate IP company carries and how it should be valued and documented. Implementation belongs with licensed tax and legal advisers in the countries involved.

Frequently asked questions

What is an IP structure?
An IP structure is an arrangement where a dedicated company owns the intangible assets and licenses them to the operating company for a fee. It serves to bundle rights, protect value and prepare a future sale.
How high can a royalty to my own company be?
As high as unrelated parties would agree. What counts are comparable licence rates, the functions and risks of the entities involved and written documentation of how the rate was derived.
Is a foreign IP company worth it?
Only if the functions that create and maintain the value of the intellectual property sit there too. Pure ownership without people and decisions leads to an adjustment of the income on review.
What is the nexus approach for IP boxes?
The nexus approach limits the benefit to the share of income attributable to your own research and development spending. Acquired IP and development outsourced to related parties are excluded or only partly counted.
Is withholding tax due on royalties paid abroad?
Often yes. Double taxation treaties and, inside the EU, the relevant directive can reduce the rate, but they require beneficial ownership and usually a certificate of residence.
Can I simply transfer my trademark to a foreign company?
Legally yes, but for tax purposes the transfer is a valuation event. If the trademark already has value, unrealised gains can be triggered and taxed, which makes timing decisive.
Where should I register my trademark?
At minimum in the markets where you actually sell. For Europe an EU trademark is the usual route, and further countries can be covered through an international registration under the Madrid system.
Do I need a holding company for an IP structure?
Not necessarily. An IP company can sit under an existing holding, and in smaller structures a clean allocation of rights inside one existing company is often sufficient.
Bastian Köhler
US LLC, HK Ltd & Growth

Bastian Köhler

Responsible for this topic within the Apatridus expert network. This article is a general orientation and does not replace advice in an individual case. Apatridus develops strategies and brokers the execution, the advice itself is provided by licensed partners.